%0 Journal Article %A Ran Leshem %A Lisa R. Goldberg %A Alan Cummings %T Optimizing Value %D 2016 %R 10.3905/jpm.2016.42.2.077 %J The Journal of Portfolio Management %P 77-89 %V 42 %N 2 %X In a series of empirical studies, the authors investigated the performance of two popular value metrics: book-toprice (B/P) ratio and earnings-to-price (E/P) ratio. In an academic study based on data from Ken French’s website, they found that, though strategies based on E/P ratio had higher return and lower risk than strategies based on B/P ratio between 1951 and 2013, B/P ratio outperformed E/P ratio between 1963 and 1990, which was the basis of the landmark study establishing B/P ratio as the academic standard. In a practitioner-oriented study that accounted for liquidity and transaction costs, strategies based on a blend of B/P and E/P ratios outperformed both single-metric strategies during most 10-year periods between 1973 and 2013. Optimized value strategies had lower tracking error, lower turnover, and a higher information ratio than rankand-chop strategies, which weight high-percentile value stocks by capitalization. Sector constraints raised both the Sharpe ratio and the information ratio of an optimized blended-value strategy.TOPICS: VAR and use of alternative risk measures of trading risk, statistical methods %U https://jpm.pm-research.com/content/iijpormgmt/42/2/77.full.pdf