RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 The Revealed Inefficiencies of the China A-H Premium JF The Journal of Portfolio Management FD Institutional Investor Journals SP jpm.2021.1.251 DO 10.3905/jpm.2021.1.251 A1 Fujun Li A1 Xiaoyang Liu A1 Vivek Viswanathan YR 2021 UL https://pm-research.com/content/early/2021/05/12/jpm.2021.1.251.abstract AB The ratio of the price of a dual-listed A-share to the price of its corresponding H-share (the A-H premium) is persistent both in aggregate and cross-sectionally. The A-H premium for a given stock converges to a universal equilibrium A-H premium but more strongly to a stock-specific equilibrium A-H premium. The latter indicates different long-run investor preferences for different stocks in the onshore A-share market versus the offshore H-share market. The authors provide evidence that this differential is driven by the high retail investor participation in the China A-share market. They propose two new factors based on the divergence of a stock’s A-H premium from its universal and stock-specific equilibrium A-H premium. These two factors earn significant Fama–French three-factor alpha and earn alpha against each other. Lastly, the authors show that a dual-listed A-share is less efficiently priced than its H-share counterpart.TOPICS: Security analysis and valuation, emerging markets, analysis of individual factors/risk premiaKey Findings▪ Chinese stocks that are dual-listed as A-shares and H-shares tend to have large, persistent A-share premiums relative to their H-share counterparts.▪ A strategy of increasing weight in firms with low A-H premiums and decreasing weight in firms with high A-H premiums tends to earn excess returns over a capitalization-weighted benchmark.▪ The A-H premium is driven primarily by inefficiencies in A-share pricing, caused by specific retail preferences from the largely retail A-share market.