Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JPM
    • Awards
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

User menu

  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in

Search

  • ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame
The Journal of Portfolio Management
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in
The Journal of Portfolio Management

The Journal of Portfolio Management

ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JPM
    • Awards
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

Expected Surplus Growth Compared with Mean–Variance Optimization

Jarrod Wilcox and Stephen Satchell
The Journal of Portfolio Management Multi-Asset Special Issue 2021, jpm.2021.1.209; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2021.1.209
Jarrod Wilcox
is president of Wealthmate, Inc., in Hudson, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Satchell
is a fellow at Trinity College in Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)
Loading

Click to login and read the full article.

Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo 
Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options
US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045
EMEA: +44 0207 139 1600

Abstract

In this article, the authors revisit a neglected paper written by Rubinstein in which he advocated a generalized logarithmic utility function. The profession has rather ignored his model in favor of the mean–variance approach, for reasons that are well known. The authors note that generalized logarithmic utility allows us to identify absolute risk aversion more directly and intuitively than the approaches adopted in mean–variance portfolio construction. They demonstrate that, for top-level asset allocation in which the conditions required by mean–variance are satisfied and mean–variance gives a good approximation to expected utility, generalized logarithmic utility gives essentially the same answer. In situations not suited to mean–variance, such as the inclusion of derivatives in portfolios or, more generally, when higher moments in return and utility probability distributions are unavoidable, Rubinstein’s model appears superior and seems particularly well suited to multi-asset investment. The authors’ simplified Bayesian model shows out-of-sample advantages for broad US asset allocation for the 2000 through mid-2020 period.

TOPICS: Quantitative methods, statistical methods, portfolio theory, portfolio construction

Key Findings

  • ▪ Maximizing the expected Rubinstein utility increases expected surplus growth for conservative investors and for those who do not rebalance frequently. Markowitz’s risk aversion parameter is replaced without requiring subjective judgement of aversion to return variance.

  • ▪ Bayesian prediction can incorporate both scenario priors and observed return data in a simple grid form. This increases model flexibility and decreases sensitivity to errors in estimates of return probability distribution parameters.

  • ▪ We demonstrate out-of-sample advantages for Rubinstein utility with simplified Bayesian prediction in broad US stock, bond, and cash allocation for the most recent decades. This is based on a prior inferred from earlier history, including the 1929 crash.

  • © 2021 Pageant Media Ltd
View Full Text

Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo

Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options

US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045

UK: 0207 139 1600

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?
Next
Back to top

Explore our content to discover more relevant research

  • By topic
  • Across journals
  • From the experts
  • Monthly highlights
  • Special collections

In this issue

The Journal of Portfolio Management: 49 (4)
The Journal of Portfolio Management
Vol. 49, Issue 4
Multi-Asset Special Issue 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The Journal of Portfolio Management.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Expected Surplus Growth Compared with Mean–Variance Optimization
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The Journal of Portfolio Management
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The Journal of Portfolio Management web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Expected Surplus Growth Compared with Mean–Variance Optimization
Jarrod Wilcox, Stephen Satchell
The Journal of Portfolio Management Jan 2021, jpm.2021.1.209; DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2021.1.209

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Save To My Folders
Share
Expected Surplus Growth Compared with Mean–Variance Optimization
Jarrod Wilcox, Stephen Satchell
The Journal of Portfolio Management Jan 2021, jpm.2021.1.209; DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2021.1.209
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Tweet Widget Facebook Like LinkedIn logo

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MEAN–VARIANCE VERSUS SURPLUS GROWTH EXPECTED UTILITY
    • STOCK, BOND, AND CASH EXAMPLE
    • CONCLUSION
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)

Similar Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar
LONDON
One London Wall, London, EC2Y 5EA
United Kingdom
+44 207 139 1600
 
NEW YORK
41 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10010
USA
+1 646 931 9045
reply@pm.research.com
 

Stay Connected

  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

MORE FROM PMR

  • News
  • Awards
  • Investment Guides
  • Videos
  • About PMR

INFORMATION FOR

  • Academics
  • Agents
  • Authors
  • Content Usage Terms

GET INVOLVED

  • Advertise
  • Publish
  • Article Licensing
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe Now
  • Sign In
  • Update your profile
  • Give us your feedback

© 2023 With Intelligence Ltd | All Rights Reserved | ISSN: 0095-4918 | E-ISSN: 2168-8656

  • Site Map
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies