Click to login and read the full article.
Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo
Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options
US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045
EMEA: +44 0207 139 1600
Abstract
In corporate pension portfolios, de-risking from stocks to bonds is often driven by funded status, with the bond allocation increasing as funded status improves. A question naturally arises out of the practice of de-risking: If de-risking based on funded-status improvement is an effective way for plans to preserve gains, does re-risking a plan’s portfolio as funded status deteriorates prove to be an effective way to recover from losses? To answer this question, the authors compare funded-status-driven re-risking to an active re-risking strategy driven by market factors. They find that re-risking driven solely by funded status adds marginal value at the cost of potentially significant additional risk, whereas an active approach to re-risking may assist in both generating alpha versus the liability as well as mitigating downside risk.
TOPICS: Retirement, risk management
- © 2018 Pageant Media Ltd
Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo
Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options
US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045
UK: 0207 139 1600