Abstract
In this article the authors challenge the standard method for measuring value that is used in academic work on factor pricing. The standard method uses lagged book data to calculate book-to-price (B/P) at portfolio formation. It aligns price data using the same lag, ignoring recent price movements. The authors propose two simple alternatives that use more timely price data; they then construct portfolios based on the different measures for a U.S. sample (from 1950 to 2011) and a global sample (from 1983 to 2011). They show that B/P ratios based on more timely prices better forecast true, unobservable B/P ratios at fiscal year-end. Value portfolios based on the timeliest measures earn statistically significant alphas, ranging between 305 and 378 basis points per year, versus the standard methods.
- © 2013 Pageant Media Ltd
Don’t have access? Register today to begin unrestricted access to our database of research.
Log in using your username and password
In this issue
Jump to section
Similar Articles
Cited By...
- Is (Systematic) Value Investing Dead?
- Hedge Fund Alpha: Cycle or Sunset?
- Resurrecting the Value Premium
- Intangible Capital and the Value Factor: Has Your Value Definition Just Expired?
- Size Factor in Multifactor Portfolios: Does the Size Factor Still Have Its Place in Multifactor Portfolios?
- Alternative Risk Premia: Is the Selection Process Important?
- Alices Adventures in Factorland: Three Blunders That Plague Factor Investing
- A Backtesting Protocol in the Era of Machine Learning
- The Tax Benefits of Relaxing the Long-Only Constraint: Do They Come from Character or Deferral?
- Factor Allocation and Asset Allocation
- Craftsmanship Alpha: An Application to Style Investing
- Measuring Factor Exposures: Uses and Abuses