Abstract
Brooks and Gray in the Fall 2004 JPM examined the accuracy of economists' long-term interest rate forecasts in Wall Street Journal surveys. They concluded that no-change naive forecasts were better than the consensus WSJ forecasts. In fact, no-change forecasts are not naive forecasts but instead rational economic forecasts. We should thus extend the Brooks and Gray conclusions that no-change forecasts are better than economists' consensus forecasts of the long-term Treasury rate to other long-term interest rates.
TOPICS: Information providers/credit ratings, interest-rate and currency swaps
- © 2006 Pageant Media Ltd
Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo
Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options
US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045
UK: 0207 139 1600