Abstract
An earlier contribution to this journal implied that protective floor investment strategies in defined-contribution pension investments beat investments in traditional asset mixes, with respect to both the probability of achieving a minimum target level of future pension income and the expected level of future pension income. These commentators show that protective floor strategies may be attractive to loss-averse investors, but they do not beat traditional investments simultaneously on expected pension income and on the probability of achieving the target pension income.
- © 2003 Pageant Media Ltd
Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo
Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options
US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045
UK: 0207 139 1600