Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JPM
    • Awards
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

User menu

  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in

Search

  • ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame
The Journal of Portfolio Management
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in
The Journal of Portfolio Management

The Journal of Portfolio Management

ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JPM
    • Awards
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter
Primary Article

What We Think About the Quality of Our Equity Markets

Robert A. Schwartz and Daniel G. Weaver
The Journal of Portfolio Management Summer 2001, 27 (4) 63-70; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2001.319814
Robert A. Schwartz
The Marvin M. Speiser professor of finance at the Zicklin School of Business at Baruch College in New York (NY 10010).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel G. Weaver
An associate professor of finance at the Zicklin School of Business at Baruch College in New York (NY 10010).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)
Loading

Abstract

Have the technological and regulatory changes in the U.S. equity markets in recent years improved or impaired market quality? As “market quality” is an ambiguous concept that is neither readily quantifiable nor amenable to straightforward empirical analysis, the authors have surveyed the opinions of sell–side and buy–side participants and academic financial economists. Academic respondents in general, and the microstructure subset in particular, are relatively positive about market quality and the efficacy of regulatory initiatives. The predominant response on both the sell–side and the buy–side is that the quality of the U.S. equity markets has deteriorated in recent years. Technology is broadly thought to be a great tool, but many industry participants believe that market structure regulation is not helping.

  • © 2001 Pageant Media Ltd

Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo

Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options

US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045

UK: 0207 139 1600

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?
PreviousNext
Back to top

Explore our content to discover more relevant research

  • By topic
  • Across journals
  • From the experts
  • Monthly highlights
  • Special collections

In this issue

The Journal of Portfolio Management
Vol. 27, Issue 4
Summer 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The Journal of Portfolio Management.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What We Think About the Quality of Our Equity Markets
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The Journal of Portfolio Management
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The Journal of Portfolio Management web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
What We Think About the Quality of Our Equity Markets
Robert A. Schwartz, Daniel G. Weaver
The Journal of Portfolio Management Jul 2001, 27 (4) 63-70; DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2001.319814

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Save To My Folders
Share
What We Think About the Quality of Our Equity Markets
Robert A. Schwartz, Daniel G. Weaver
The Journal of Portfolio Management Jul 2001, 27 (4) 63-70; DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2001.319814
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Tweet Widget Facebook Like LinkedIn logo

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)

Similar Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • If You Had Everything Computationally…
  • Corporate Bond Portfolio Analysis
  • The Symmetric Downside-Risk Sharpe Ratio
Show more Primary Article
LONDON
One London Wall, London, EC2Y 5EA
United Kingdom
+44 207 139 1600
 
NEW YORK
41 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10010
USA
+1 646 931 9045
pm-research@pageantmedia.com
 

Stay Connected

  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

MORE FROM PMR

  • News
  • Awards
  • Investment Guides
  • Videos
  • About PMR

INFORMATION FOR

  • Academics
  • Agents
  • Authors
  • Content Usage Terms

GET INVOLVED

  • Advertise
  • Publish
  • Article Licensing
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe Now
  • Sign In
  • Update your profile
  • Give us your feedback

© 2022 Pageant Media Ltd | All Rights Reserved | ISSN: 0095-4918 | E-ISSN: 2168-8656

  • Site Map
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies